{"id":3482,"date":"2012-09-06T16:20:23","date_gmt":"2012-09-07T00:20:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/?p=3482"},"modified":"2012-09-11T09:09:03","modified_gmt":"2012-09-11T17:09:03","slug":"if-you-meet-neils-degrasse-tyson-on-the-road-kill-him","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/?p=3482","title":{"rendered":"If You Meet Neil DeGrasse Tyson on the Road, Kill Him."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An excerpt from a talk I&#8217;m working on, to be delivered a month and an ocean away:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div id=\"attachment_3483\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/ndtama_616.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3483\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3483\" title=\"ndtama_616\" src=\"http:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/ndtama_616-300x184.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"184\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/ndtama_616-300x184.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/ndtama_616.jpg 616w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3483\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">True, but irrelevant.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Two thirds of North America <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Angel#Contemporary_belief_in_angels\">believes in Angels<\/a> ; only half accept the reality of global warming. 78% believe that human beings were created by an invisible sky fairy, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/21814\/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx\">46% believe<\/a> that this fairy created them in their present form ten thousand years ago (up from only 40% in 2011). Almost half of the adults in the US cannot correctly answer the question &#8220;How long does it take for the Earth to complete an orbit of the sun?&#8221; <em>even when the question is presented as multiple choice<\/em>. \u00a0The level of scientific literacy in North America is nothing short of pathetic.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Ignorance would be bad enough, but North Americans have gone further. They don&#8217;t just endure ignorance, they <em>embrace<\/em> it: are not just\u00a0 ignorant of science, but actively hostile to it.\u00a0 And so tens of millions of N&#8217;Americans reject outright the reality of anthropogenic climate change, of evolution by natural selection, of even the effectiveness of <em>vaccination <\/em>for chrissake, despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary. They don&#8217;t care about evidence; anything they find objectionable, they dismiss as lies and conspiracies by intellectual eggheads who are not to be trusted.<\/p>\n<p>This was recently driven home to me on a very personal level.\u00a0 A couple of years back I was on trial in the US for asking questions during a border search; that&#8217;s a felony in the US, punishable by up to three years in prison. While preparing our defense my lawyer consulted with various colleagues, and during one such consultation I remember feeling vaguely confused over something they obviously considered a major issue:\u00a0 how to counter the body blow the Prosecutor would deliver when she referred to me as &#8220;Doctor Watts&#8221;. At first I couldn&#8217;t see why they were so worried; what difference did it make? But after a few minutes I realized that in the United States, being called &#8220;Doctor&#8221; was an insult: this jury would be hostile to me the moment they learned that I had an advanced degree, for no other reason than that I <em>had <\/em>an advanced degree. Educated people are not trusted in the United States of America; educated people are the enemy.\u00a0 And sure enough, the prosecutor went out of her way to call me &#8220;Doctor Watts&#8221;, and my lawyer went out of <em>his<\/em> way to point out that I didn&#8217;t really use that term, that I really wasn&#8217;t one of <em>those people<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>A number of pro-science advocates actually blame scientists themselves for the public&#8217;s attitude.\u00a0 Scientists should reach out more, they say, climb down from their ivory towers and make science accessible to the common man. People just don&#8217;t <em>understand<\/em> science; if we only explained how cool it is, people would get it. Back in the day you had Carl Sagan, the geek-cheerleader&#8217;s cheerleader; these days you&#8217;ve Neil DeGrasse Tyson. We need more of this, the argument goes.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not convinced. I think it was Einstein who famously said that you can&#8217;t reason someone out of a position they did not arrive at through reason\u2014 and America&#8217;s fundamentalist beliefs were not arrived at through reason. People may not understand science \u2014 it&#8217;s blatantly obvious that many do not \u2014 but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s why they hate it. They hate it because it tells them things they don&#8217;t want to believe. Science is the messenger they can shoot.<\/p>\n<p>And the more you know about how science works, ironically, the <em>easier<\/em> it is to shoot at.<\/p>\n<p>Science follows the creed of disproof, after all. The whole edifice is founded on the admission that everything we know might be wrong, that any of today&#8217;s &#8220;facts&#8221; might tomorrow be tested and found wanting. Science is pretty straightforward as a concept; in practice it&#8217;s messy as hell, full of arguments and counterarguments, noise and statistical filters. It&#8217;s a perfect target to those who crave certitude and simplicity: every dispute over detail can be twisted into an indictment of the entire process, every new discovery lets the Ignorantsia thump their bibles and say &#8220;See, the scientists can&#8217;t even keep their story straight amongst <em>themselves<\/em>! Why should we take any of that global-warming bullshit seriously?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: yesterday&#8217;s momentous announcement that so much of what we once called &#8220;junk DNA&#8221; \u2014 all those bits that we once thought accumulated for no other reason than the sheer Darwinian selfishness of parasitic nucleotides \u2014 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v489\/n7414\/pdf\/nature11247.pdf\">actually serve a host of vital regulatory functions<\/a>. (Update: Or maybe not. Apparently the ENCODE people simply <a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/staff\/2012\/09\/most-of-what-you-read-was-wrong-how-press-releases-rewrote-scientific-history\/\"> redefined &#8220;functional&#8221; to apply to code sequences that actually aren&#8217;t<\/a>; &#8220;junk DNA&#8221; can breathe a sigh of relief.) To a scientist, such moments of enlightenment \u2014 the chance to discard the old and replace it with something <em>better<\/em> \u2014\u00a0 are what the whole endeavor is all about.\u00a0 And yet it took less than 24 hours for the creationists to turn that into &#8220;Hah! Wrong again!\u00a0 <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolutionnews.org\/2012\/09\/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html\">Everything plays a part in God&#8217;s Plan!<\/a><\/em>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s just what people do. It&#8217;s been suggested that reasoned debate didn&#8217;t evolve as a truth-seeking strategy at all, but as a means of persuasion and social control.\u00a0 Lofty rhetoric evolved to serve dogma, not rationality: the things we call <em>empiricism<\/em> and <em>logic<\/em> are just side-effects, and not especially strong ones. Given the endless litany of cognitive glitches that interfere with our thought processes \u2014 confirmation bias, sunk-cost fallacies, \u00a0the Semmelweis reflex to name but a few \u2014 it&#8217;s hard to argue that we&#8217;re in any way optimized for impartial analysis.\u00a0 If we&#8217;re optimized for anything, it&#8217;s denial: the ability to reframe unwelcome facts in a way that justifies our own preconceptions.<\/p>\n<p>So while I have nothing but admiration for the likes of ol&#8217; Neil, forgive me if I don&#8217;t regard attempts to &#8220;educate people about science&#8221; as an unmitigated good: too often they just play into the hands of the enemy.\u00a0 Most arguments are not joined with any sincere desire to arrive at the truth; they are joined to be <em>won<\/em>. It doesn&#8217;t matter how many decimal places your results are significant to, or how homoscedastic your residuals turn out to be; people weigh arguments in their guts, and the gut is blind to statistics.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If I&#8217;m full of shit, tell me now.\u00a0 I have maybe two weeks to change my mind.<\/p>\n<p>(<strong>Retro edit<\/strong>: Lightly deharshened 11\/9\/2012)  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An excerpt from a talk I&#8217;m working on, to be delivered a month and an ocean away: Two thirds of North America believes in Angels ; only half accept the reality of global warming. 78% believe that human beings were created by an invisible sky fairy, and 46% believe that this fairy created them in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scilitics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3482"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3502,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3482\/revisions\/3502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}