{"id":202,"date":"2008-12-06T08:13:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-06T16:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/?p=202"},"modified":"2008-12-06T08:13:00","modified_gmt":"2008-12-06T16:13:00","slug":"high-concept-low-brow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/?p=202","title":{"rendered":"High-Concept Low-Brow"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s credibility of a sort, I guess.  The Sydney Morning Herald has just published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/news\/entertainment\/film\/a-fatal-attraction\/2008\/12\/04\/1228257208366.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2\">a John Birmingham piece<\/a> which jumps off from the teenybopper suckfest &#8220;Twilight&#8221; to dip its toes in the whole pop-culture vampire mystique.  And what should appear, mixed in with all the Buffy and <i>True Blood<\/i> callouts, but a whole paragraph devoted to the vampires of <i>Blindsight<\/i>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In author Peter Watts&#8217;s hard-science space opera, Blindsight, Dracula&#8217;s children aren&#8217;t disguised at all; they&#8217;re reborn from ancient DNA samples and put to work by humanity, which needs their superior physical and intellectual skills to face off a universe full of even scarier monsters. It all sounds like a low-brow spook&#8217;n&#8217;shoot, an ill-advised cocktail of the undead and laser beams. But it&#8217;s high-concept low-brow, with Watts providing reams of credible-sounding scientific &#8220;research&#8221; in a &#8220;Notes and References&#8221; section that recalls nothing so much as the early work of the recently departed Michael Crichton.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Birmingham evidently didn&#8217;t realize that those &#8220;references&#8221; are real, but that&#8217;s cool.  I don&#8217;t even mind being compared to Crichton;  I actually quite like a lot of Mikey&#8217;s &#8220;early work&#8221;&mdash; and hey, if a critic in a mainstream newspaper thinks the shoe fits, maybe some publisher might notice a vacant niche waiting to be filled&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>What I do find a bit odd, though, is that <i>Blindsight <\/i>got as much attention it did (not that I&#8217;m complaining).  Beyond the obligatory commentary on the <i>Twilight<\/i> novels, the article focuses almost entirely on cinevision:  Buffy, True Blood, even some pretty strained references to Borgs and zombies. The only non-Stoker, non-Meyer book to get any attention is some vampire-gumshoe novel by Charlie Huston.  And while I&#8217;m never one to turn down free publicity,  I seem to remember some guy called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/I-Am-Legend-Richard-Matheson\/dp\/B001FOR5XU\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1228580114&amp;sr=1-1\">Matheson<\/a> doing something along the same lines a while back\u2014 something that can hardly have fallen out of the public eye so soon after Will Smith poked it back in there \u2014 not to mention a more recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Fledgling-Octavia-E-Butler\/dp\/0446696161\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1228579662&amp;sr=1-1\">vampire riff<\/a> by that Butler chick.  And there&#8217;s no way I wield a fraction of the influence of either of those authors, even on their bad days.  So I&#8217;m wondering why <i>Blindsight<\/i> made Birmingham&#8217;s cut, when <i>I am Legend<\/i> and <i>Fledgling<\/i> didn&#8217;t.  It obviously isn\u2019t a function of either literary quality or sales.<\/p>\n<p>You know what that leaves.  Cover art.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s credibility of a sort, I guess. The Sydney Morning Herald has just published a John Birmingham piece which jumps off from the teenybopper suckfest &#8220;Twilight&#8221; to dip its toes in the whole pop-culture vampire mystique. And what should appear, mixed in with all the Buffy and True Blood callouts, but a whole paragraph devoted [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blindsight","category-ink-on-art"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rifters.com\/crawl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}